Insights

Claims Contracts Dispute Resolution News Resources

Delay and Termination: When Does Delay Become Repudiatory – Lessons from Durkan v Wallace

Delay and termination: When Does Delay Become Repudiatory – Lessons from Durkan v Wallace The Technology and Construction Court (“TCC”) has recently handed down judgment …

Lessons from Netomnia v MJ Quinn – Contractual Payment Notice Requirements Must Be Complied With Strictly

Lessons from Netomnia v MJ Quinn – contractual payment notice requirements must be complied with strictly The Technology and Construction Court has recently considered whether …

Elliott v Lloyd’s – Fraudulent Claims and the Importance of Credible Evidence – Lessons for Construction Disputes

Elliott v Lloyd’s – Fraudulent Claims and the Importance of Credible Evidence – Lessons for Construction Disputes Although Elliott v The Members of Lloyd’s Syndicate …

BLL v STI High Treshold for Interim Relief Under Section 44 of the Arbitration Act 1996

BLL v STI: The TCC Reaffirms the High Threshold for Interim Relief Under Section 44 of the Arbitration Act 1996 In BLL v STI [2026] …

Lessons from Oakland v Stepnell on JCT Final Accounts – The Importance of a Valid Final Statement & Draft Doesn’t Mean Final

Lessons from Oakland v Stepnell on JCT Final Accounts – The Importance of a Valid Final Statement – Draft Doesn’t Mean Final The Technology and …

Insights

Delay and Termination: When Does Delay Become Repudiatory – Lessons from Durkan v Wallace

Lessons from Netomnia v MJ Quinn – Contractual Payment Notice Requirements Must Be Complied With Strictly

Elliott v Lloyd’s – Fraudulent Claims and the Importance of Credible Evidence – Lessons for Construction Disputes

BLL v STI High Treshold for Interim Relief Under Section 44 of the Arbitration Act 1996

Lessons from Oakland v Stepnell on JCT Final Accounts – The Importance of a Valid Final Statement & Draft Doesn’t Mean Final

Deerns v VDC – Payment Provisions Under Scrutiny, One Clause and a £910,000 Drafting Mistake

Mulalley v STO – Court Awards 87.5% Contribution Against Cladding Manufacturer

Lloyds v Accor – TCC Confirms Disclosure Extends to Personal Devices

Clerkenwell v HG Construction the Importance of Raising All Defences During Adjudication

Insights

Sign up for Legal Tips & Events